EPR Evidence for Mechanistic Diversity of Cu(II)/Peroxygen Oxidation Systems by Tracing the Origin of DMPO Spin Adducts

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) has been extensively used for the identification of free radicals that are generated from advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) so as to establish the reaction mechanism. However, some misinterpretations or controversies on the identity of detected EPR signals remain in the literature. This study, with Cu(II)-based AOPs as examples, comprehensively investigated the origin of 5,5-dimethyl-l-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) adducts in Cu(II) alone, Cu(II)/H2O2, Cu(II)/peroxymonosulfate (PMS), and Cu(II)/peroxydisulfate (PDS) systems. In most Cu(II) systems, DMPO-OH signals can be detected even without any peroxygens, indicating the presence of other origins of this adduct in addition to the genuine spin trapping of center dot OH by DMPO. According to the formed secondary radical adducts (DMPO-OCH3 from a nonradical process or DMPO-CH2OH from a radical oxidation) derived from methanol quenching, we propose that CuO+, instead of free radicals, is involved in the Cu(II)/PMS system, while center dot OH is indeed generated in the Cu(II)/ H2O2 and Cu(II)/PDS systems under neutral conditions. Notably, O-17-incorporation experiments demonstrate that -OH in the detected DMPO-OH adduct originates 100% from water in the Cu(II) alone system but the amount of -OH is over 99.8% from the oxidant while peroxygens are added. In addition, DMPO-O-2(-) appears only in the Cu(II)/PDS system under highly alkaline conditions and H2O is not involved in superoxide formation.

Automated summary

This study comprehensively investigates the origin of 5,5-dimethyl-l-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) adducts in Cu(II) based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), and finds that there are other factors contributing to the formation of these adducts in addition to the genuine spin trapping mechanism.