4.5 Article

Sedimentation rates and sediment age of the high-altitude cold desert Ramsar Wetland, the Chandratal, inferred from radionuclide (210Pb and 137Cs) technique

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 194, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-09984-9

Keywords

Sedimentation rate; Cs-137 isotope; Pb-210 isotope; CRS model; Cs-137 peak method; Human interference

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pristine Himalayan Wetlands are facing endangerment due to increased sedimentation rate and anthropogenic encroachment. Human interference has resulted in faster sedimentation in recent years.
In the current scenario, the pristine Himalayan Wetlands are under endangerment due to higher sedimentation rate, including siltation, reduction of ecological value, pollution, and significant anthropogenic encroachment along with advanced civilization. The more increased sedimentation reduces the depth and existing expansion of the Wetland. This study articulates the record of sedimentation in the Chandratal present in Western Himalaya, Himachal Pradesh, India, at the altitude of 4300 m. The sedimentation rate of the Chandratal was calculated based on a 1-m core sample considering isotopes of Cs-137 and Pb-210 dating techniques. The present study based on the Constant Rate of Supply (CRS) model of Pb-210 reveals that the Wetland experienced an average sedimentation rate of 1.75 +/- 0.04 cm/year during the last 63 years observed from 1953 to 2016. The Cs-137 peak method-based calculated sedimentation rate of the Chandratal is 1.6 +/- 0.02 cm/year representing the years for about 62 years from 1954 to 2016. The Wetland's functional survival prevalence was estimated to be 420 and 459 years based on Pb-210 and Cs-137 dating techniques, respectively. The study communicates that the magnified human interference in the catchment area of the Chandratal is accountable for the faster sedimentation in recent years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available