4.6 Article

Biofertilizers can enhance nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 3655-3671

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.16027

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cooperative Research Centres Projects [CRCPFIVE000015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the effects of biofertilizers formulated with organic waste, mineral nitrogen, or plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on nitrogen efficiency. The results from commercial sugarcane farms indicate that using biofertilizers with a 60% nitrogen rate can improve crop yield and induce changes in soil microbial communities.
Fertilizers are costly inputs into crop systems. To compensate for inefficiencies and losses from soil, farmers apply on average double the amount of nitrogen (N) fertilizer acquired by crops. We explored if N efficiency improves with biofertilizers formulated with organic waste, mineral N or plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). We compared treatments receiving mineral N fertilizer or biofertilizers at industry-recommended (100%) or lower (60%) N rates at two commercial sugarcane farms. Biofertilizer at the 60% N-rate generated promising results at one farm with significantly higher biomass and sugar yield than the no-N control, which matched the 100% mineral N treatment. This yield difference was accompanied by a shift in microbial diversity and composition. Correlation analysis confirmed that shifts in microbial communities were strongly linked to soil mineral N levels, as well as crop productivity and yield. Microbial co-occurrence networks further revealed that biofertilizer, including treatments with an added PGPR, can enhance bacterial associations, especially in the context of complex fungal networks. Collectively, the results confirm that biofertilizers have quantifiable effects on soil microbial communities in a crop system setting, which underscores the opportunities for biofertilizers to promote N use efficiency and the circular N economy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available