Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 363-381Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-022-01619-6
Keywords
Bukovina; Carpathian Mountains; fungi; ethnomycology; Hutsuls; rural areas
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Sustainable forest management emphasizes the multipurpose use of forest resources, including wild mushrooms. A comparison between Ukrainian Hutsuls and Romanian Hutsuls living in similar ecological environments revealed that the former primarily rely on forest products, including wild mushrooms, as their main source of income, while the latter use them solely as additional income. Local residents expressed concerns about their right to collect wild mushrooms being restricted by forest management and protected areas.
Sustainable forest management highlights the multipurpose use of all forest resources, including the use of wild mushrooms, by a variety of forest users and especially for rural livelihoods. To achieve sustainable forest management, among others, decision-makers and forest managers need to identify the important elements for the livelihoods of local communities dependent on forests. Therefore, our aim is to analyse the importance of contemporary use of wild mushrooms for daily livelihoods in rural areas of the Carpathian Mountains by comparing two ethnic groups, Hutsuls and Romanians, living in a similar ecological environment and formerly belonging to the historical region of Bukovina, but currently split by the border between Ukraine and Romania which have different governments and economic situations. One hundred and twenty-one face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted in the summers of 2018 and 2019. We compared the Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) of Romanians and Hutsuls living, respectively, in lowlands and mountain areas on both sides of the border. Our results demonstrated the homogenous use of mushroom species for cultural purposes (e.g. ritual foods). Yet, we detected a remarkable difference in the role mushrooms play in providing income: Hutsuls in Ukraine use forest products as a main (rarely additional) source of income, while Romanian Hutsuls use them solely as additional income. Romanians on both sides considered mushrooms mainly as food and did not sell them (probably due in part to less abundance in the area). We also documented the fear of local residents that forest management and protected areas could suppress the right to collect wild mushrooms. The use of mushrooms is an important aspect of local TEK and needs to be considered as a part of sustainable forest management and as a means of poverty reduction in the region.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available