4.7 Article

The brain as a structure: A model of how fluid-structure interactions stiffen brain tissue after injury

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113960

Keywords

Tissue mechanics; Fluid-structure interactions; Brain injury

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31870941]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (STCSM) [19441907700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the structural changes of brain tissue after injury and suggests that changes in the neuro-vasculature may alter the mechanical responses of brain tissue, predisposing individuals to subsequent injuries.
The brain contains a tree of vasculature that contributes not only oxygen and nutrients but also structural integrity to the brain parenchyma. The structure formed by this vasculature affects the mechanical response of brain tissue both before and after injury, and maybe a determinant of an individual's injury susceptibility. To investigate structural changes of brain tissue after injury, we constructed an idealized representative volume element model of fluid-structure interactions within brain parenchyma and applied it to study how vessel size, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) flow velocity, and CSF flow networks relate to previous experimental observations of healthy and injured brain tissue. We hypothesized that injury-associated structural changes to the neuro-vasculature may alter the mechanical responses of brain tissue and predispose an individual to subsequent injury. Parameters representing the mechanics of uninjured and injured brain tissue were verified against experimental characterizations of these tissue in uniaxial compression and shear. Results supported our hypothesis, and highlight the importance of considering cerebral vasculature as a structure in predicting and analyzing the brain's response to mechanical loading.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available