4.7 Article

Dissimilar weld failure: A forensic analysis to determine primary failure mechanisms

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106453

Keywords

Failure; Dissimilar material; Weld; Concentrated solar receiver; Microstructure

Funding

  1. Australian Government, through the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) [ARC LE180100136 Perilli]
  2. Australian Government, through the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)
  3. Australian Research Council [ARC LE180100136 Perilli, ARC LE130100038 LIEF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic forensic analysis on a low-pressure CO2 receiver and found that grain boundary oxidation damage was the cause of failure in the adjacent stainless-steel tube.
Solar receivers are an integral part of a concentrated solar power plant and commonly utilise tubular structures to absorb solar energy and transfer the heat into a heat transfer fluid. These systems often contain dissimilar materials joined through welds which are exposed to cyclic temperatures, which can be a locus of failure. A systematic forensic analysis was carried out on a low-pressure CO2 receiver that had developed extensive cracking. Microstructural characterisation using micro-computed tomography was performed to understand the failure mechanism in an area adjacent to a welded section of the two dissimilar alloys Haynes 230 and 253 MA. An electrolytical oxalic acid etch showed grain boundary damage from oxidation. Grain boundary damage through oxidation was confirmed with SEM and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis as the likely metallurgical degradation mechanism which, combined with thermally induced stress cycles led to the failure of the weaker stainless-steel tube adjacent to the weld.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available