4.7 Article

Solving a novel multi-divisional project portfolio selection and scheduling problem

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104771

Keywords

Project selection and scheduling; Heuristic; Meta-heuristic; Memetic algorithm; Hybrid algorithm

Funding

  1. Australian Department of Defence, Defence Science and Technology Project [RG191353]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a novel model for project portfolio selection and scheduling problem (PPSSP) that can handle multiple groups of projects in real-world scenarios. It also presents three hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms to provide high-quality solutions.
A common problem faced by organizations is how to select and schedule an optimal portfolio of projects subject to various constraints, such as a limited budget. This problem is known as the project portfolio selection and scheduling problem (PPSSP). Despite the widespread nature of this problem, no existing model adequately addresses a sufficient set of characteristics that arise in real-world problems. One contribution of this article is the proposal of a novel, practical class of PPSSP that consists of multiple groups of projects, proposed by different sections of a major organization. The proposed problem can be considered as a generalized PPSSP given that many specific PPSSPs reported in the literature can be generated by relaxing certain constraints. As this is a novel formulation, existing algorithms cannot ensure high-quality solutions to this problem. Thus, a further contribution of this article is the design of three hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms based on a custompurpose heuristic and local search operator. A case problem, inspired by future force design (FFD) in the Australian Defence Force (ADF), is presented to exemplify the applicability of this model to a real-world problem. Results indicate that the obtained solutions are of acceptable quality for implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available