Journal
ENERGY POLICY
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112989
Keywords
EU ETS; Decarbonisation; Carbon leakage; Firm performance; Difference-in-differences
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluates the impact of EU ETS indirect cost compensation on the performance of aided firms using sectoral and country differences in regulation and a unique dataset on beneficiaries. The results show that receiving compensation for indirect costs does not significantly affect labor productivity, but there is evidence of negative performance in terms of turnover, value of total assets, and employment. However, the negative effects are less pronounced in sectors more vulnerable to carbon leakage risk, and higher compensation amounts improve performance.
Decarbonisation implies conversion to electrification with a subsequent increase in electricity consumption. The EU Emission Trading System (EU ETS) compensates firms for the higher electricity costs. We exploit sectoral and country differences in regulation and a unique dataset on beneficiaries to evaluate the impact of EU ETS indirect cost compensation on the performance of aided firms. Receiving compensation for indirect costs does not have a statistically significant impact on labour productivity. Conversely, there is evidence of a negative performance in terms of turnover, value of total assets and employment of beneficiaries. Results suggest that the amounts transferred to firms might not fully compensate for the higher cost of energy in aided countries. However, the negative effects fade in sectors more exposed to carbon leakage risk. As far as aid intensity is concerned, esti-mates imply that higher compensation amounts improve performance.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available