4.7 Article

Efficient production of renewable hydrocarbon fuels using waste CO2 and green H2 by integrating Fe-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and olefin oligomerization

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 248, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123616

Keywords

CO(2 )utilization; Process integration; Fischer-tropsch synthesis; Olefin oligomerization

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [2017M1A2A2043133]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200694, 20KJB530002, 21KJB480014]
  3. Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professors Program
  4. open program of the State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2021-K32]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, PtL and PtG technologies have been considered as promising pathways for renewable energy storage and CO2 mitigation. In this study, two hybrid processes integrating F-T synthesis and olefin oligomerization were proposed to enhance the production of value-added liquid hydrocarbons. Process modeling and case study showed that both processes are efficient for converting CO2 into high-value hydrocarbons.
Recently, Power-to-Liquids (PtL) and Power-to-Gas (PtG) technologies have been regarded as promising pathways for renewable energy storage and CO2 mitigation. Herein, we newly proposed two PtL/PtG hybrid processes (Cases A and B) by integrating the Fe-based Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) synthesis and olefin oligomerization, to further enhance the production of value-added liquid hydrocarbons. The process modelling and case study were implemented to evaluate their process performances by using Aspen Plus. In addition, the effects of different feeding conditions (i.e., CO/CO2 feeding) and process configurations (i.e., F-T synthesis only or two-stage reactor) were also comparatively analyzed. It is found that both Cases A and B are efficient technologies for converting CO2 into value-added hydrocarbons, and Case A is found to be more beneficial in the aspects of the carbon and thermal efficiencies, and net CO2 reduction. While, Case B is competitive in producing high-value liquid hydrocarbons. Moreover, the options of CO2 feeding and two-stage reactor are more preferable than the options of CO feeding and F-T synthesis only, and both Cases A and B are more competitive in the aspects of syncrude production, thermal efficiency, and CO2 reduction, as compared to the Base cases 1-3. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available