4.7 Article

Experimental study of organic Rankine cycle with three-fluid recuperator for cryogenic cold energy recovery

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 242, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122550

Keywords

Recuperative ORC; Cryogenic cold energy; Three-fluid recuperator; Optimal heat source temperature; Thermal efficiency; Exergy analysis

Funding

  1. Chenguang Program [17CG50]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51706129]
  3. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M650084]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [18040501800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental studies were conducted on a 1 kW-scale organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system with R290 as the working medium for cryogenic cold energy recovery. The system operated under basic ORC (bORC) and recuperative ORC (rORC) working modes using a three-fluid wounded tube heat exchanger. Results showed that rORC had higher net power outputs, energy efficiency, and exergy efficiency compared to bORC when utilizing hot water and liquid nitrogen as heat and cold sources.
In this paper, experimentally studies of a 1 kW-scale organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with R290 as working medium were carried out for cryogenic cold energy recovery. Specifically, a three-fluid wounded tube heat exchanger was utilized as the condenser and the recuperator, which made the system operate under the basic ORC (bORC) and the recuperative ORC (rORC) working modes. The hot water and the liquid nitrogen were respectively used as the heat source and cold source. The system performances were evaluated at 20-50 & DEG;C of the heat source,-170~-160 & DEG;C and 60-120 kg/h of the cold source. The optimal heat source temperatures were obtained for the different cold source conditions. Moreover, the superiority of the rORC was verified. The results demonstrated that the maximum net power outputs were 0.673 kW and 0.894 kW for the bORC and rORC, respectively. For the bORC and the rORC, the maximum energy efficiency was 5.23% and 6.49%, and the maximum exergy efficiency was 21.34% and 28.99%, respectively. The cold energy efficiency varies in the range of 1.73%-14.20% and 1.16%-19.72% for the bORC and rORC, respectively. The three-fluid recuperator occupied the largest exergy loss, which varied in the range of 66.59-84.12%. (C)& nbsp;2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available