4.7 Article

Heat balance modelling and simulation of non-mixing buffer tank design for hydronic heating applications

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123213

Keywords

Hydronic heating systems; Heat balance modelling; Buffer tank; Water mixing; System design and simulation

Funding

  1. NSERC Discovery Grants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper aims to develop a theoretical model for a non-mixing buffer tank system in hydronic heating applications. The non-mixing design, which includes a movable separation plate in the buffer tank, allows for separate storage of supply hot water and return cold water. Simulation results show that the non-mixing design achieves better system efficiency, boiler efficiency, and cycle period compared to the mixing design. Additionally, the non-mixing design offers better control of supply water temperature, supporting outdoor reset control of boilers.
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it aims to develop a theoretical model for a non-mixing buffer tank system for hydronic heating applications. The traditional buffer tanks often involve water mixing where the boiler's hot water is mixed with the system's return water. This practice reduces the tem-perature differences (DT) through the boilers and the in-space heating equipment, bringing in concerns of their thermal performance. To address this concern, the non-mixing buffer tank system is designed with a movable separation plate in a buffer tank, which can store supply hot water and return cold water separately. The theoretical model of the non-mixing design explores the dynamics of water temperatures and the interactions of system components. As the second purpose, this paper then conducts a simu-lation study to compare both mixing and non-mixing designs under the same heating loads. As a result, it is observed that the non-mixing design can achieve better system efficiency (e.g., 86.7% versus 82.0% for low heating loads) due to better average boiler's efficiency (90.5% versus 86.8%) and longer cycle period (37.85 min vs. 9.27 min). In addition, the non-mixing design allows better control of supply water temperature, which can better support the outdoor reset control of boilers.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available