4.5 Article

Simulation of Water Influx and Gasified Gas Transport during Underground Coal Gasification with Controlled Retracting Injection Point Technology

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15113997

Keywords

underground coal gasification (UCG); controlled retraction injection point (CRIP); water inflow; gas migration; pressure distribution

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Project from PetroChina [RIPED-2021-JS-455]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project of Shanxi Province in China [20201101002]
  3. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [2462020QNXZ003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to address the issues of gasification failure, environmental pollution, and low calorific value in underground coal gasification. By establishing a geological model and simulating the migration of different gases, some relevant patterns are identified, and pressure distribution characteristics are presented. These findings are of great significance for guiding the design of operational parameters and monitoring well deployment, ensuring the safety and reliability of on-site gasification.
Underground coal gasification (UCG) may change the energy consumption structure from coal-dominated to gas-dominated in the years to come. Before that, three important problems need to be solved, including failure of gasification due to large amounts of water pouring into the gasifier, environmental pollution caused by gas migration to the surface, and low calorific value caused by poor control of the degree of gasification. In this study, a geological model is first established using the computer modeling group (CMG), a commercial software package for reservoir simulation. Then, the inflow of coal seam water into the gasifier during the controlled retracting injection point (CRIP) gasification process is simulated based on the geological model, and the maximum instantaneous water inflow is simulated too. Meanwhile, the migration of gasified gas is also simulated, and the migration discipline of different gases is shown. Finally, the pressure distributions in two stages are presented, pointing out the dynamic pressure characteristics during the UCG process. The results show that (a) the cavity width, production pressure, and gasifier pressure are negatively correlated with the maximum instantaneous water inflow, while the initial formation pressure, injection pressure, coal seam floor aquifer energy, and temperature are positively correlated; (b) CO2 is mainly concentrated near the production well and largely does not migrate upward, O-2 migrates upward slowly, while CH4, CO and H-2 migrate relatively quickly. When the injection-production pressure difference is 2 MPa, it takes 33.5 years, 40 years, and 44.6 years for CH4, CO, and H-2 to migrate from a depth of 1000 m to 200 m, respectively. When the pressure difference increases to 4 MPa, the gas migration rate increases about two-fold. The aquifer (3 MPa) above a coal outcrop can slow down the upward migration rate of gas by 0.03 m/day; (c) the pressure near the production well changes more significantly than the pressure near the injection well. The overall gasifier pressure rises with gasifier width increases, and the pressure distribution always presents an asymmetric unimodal distribution during the receding process of the gas injection point. The simulation work can provide a theoretical basis for the operation parameters design and monitoring of the well deployment, ensuring the safety and reliability of on-site gasification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available