4.5 Article

Rapid Quantitation of Coal Proximate Analysis by Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15082728

Keywords

LIBS; coal; proximate analysis; PCR; ANN

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific research program of Hebei administration for market regulation [2022ZD09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the use of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy assisted by chemometric methods to predict the proximate analysis of coal. By comparing three models, it was found that principal component regression (PCR) is the most accurate and stable prediction method. It not only achieves accurate prediction but also shortens the modeling time.
Proximate analysis of coal is of great significance to ensure the safe and economic operation of coal-fired and biomass-fired power generation units. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) assisted by chemometric methods could realize the prediction of coal proximate analysis rapidly, which makes up for the shortcomings of the traditional method. In this paper, three quantitative models were proposed to predict the proximate analysis of coal, including principal component regression (PCR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and principal component analysis coupled with ANN (PCA-ANN). Three model evaluation indicators, such as the coefficient of determination (R-2), root-mean-square error of cross-validation (RMSECV), and mean square error (MSE), were applied to measure the accuracy and stability of the models. The most accurate and stable prediction of coal proximate analysis was achieved by PCR, of which the average R-2, RMSECV, and MSE values were 0.9944, 0.39%, and 0.21, respectively. Although the R-2 values of ANN and PCA-ANN were greater than 0.9, the higher RMSECV and MSE values indicated that ANN and PCA-ANN were inferior to PCR. Compared with the other two models, PCR could not only achieve accurate prediction, but also shorten the modeling time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available