4.7 Article

Phase 2 Trial of Sunitinib and Gemcitabine in Patients With Sarcomatoid and/or Poor-Risk Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Journal

CANCER
Volume 121, Issue 19, Pages 3435-3443

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29503

Keywords

chemotherapy; poor risk; renal cell carcinoma; sarcomatoid; vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); targeted

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney Specialized Program of Research Excellence [P50CA101942]
  3. Trust Family
  4. Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with an aggressive biology and a poor prognosis. Poor-risk RCC is defined by clinical prognostic factors and demonstrates similarly aggressive behavior. No standard treatment exists for patients with sarcomatoid RCC, and treatment options for patients with poor-risk disease are of limited benefit. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy in clinically aggressive RCC. METHODS: This was a phase 2, single-arm trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with sarcomatoid or poor-risk RCC. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker correlatives. RESULTS: Overall, 39 patients had sarcomatoid RCC, and 33 had poor-risk RCC. The ORR was 26% for patients with sarcomatoid RCC and 24% for patients with poor-risk RCC. The median TTP and OS for patients with sarcomatoid RCC were 5 and 10 months, respectively. For patients with poor-risk disease, the median TTP and OS were 5.5 and 15 months, respectively. Patients whose tumors had >10% sarcomatoid histology had a higher clinical benefit rate (ORR plus stable disease) than those with <= 10% sarcomatoid histology (P=.04). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included neutropenia (n = 20), anemia (n = 10), and fatigue (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that antiangiogenic therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy are an active and well-tolerated combination for patients with aggressive RCC. The combination may be more efficacious than either therapy alone and is currently under further investigation. (C) 2015 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available