Journal
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108664
Keywords
Land cover change; Climate change; Gross primary production; The Shelterbelt Program for Pearl River; TL-LUE model
Categories
Funding
- National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0606604]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [42077419]
- Open Funding Project of the State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science [OFSLRSS202012]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
China has implemented large-scale afforestation projects in recent decades to improve its ecological environment. This study found that solar radiation and land cover change are the dominant factors influencing forest gross primary production (GPP) in different stages of afforestation projects.
China has implemented a series of large-scale afforestation projects to improve its ecological environment in recent decades. Meanwhile, the climate conditions in China have changed substantially. However, whether afforestation or climate change dominates vegetation gross primary production (GPP) in different stages of such afforestation projects is not clear. Here, taking the region of the Shelterbelt Program for Pearl River (SPPR) as the study area, we conducted six scenario simulations using the two-leaf light use efficiency (TL-LUE) model to decouple the effects of land cover change (LCC) and climate factors, i.e., solar radiation (Rad), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and air temperature (Ta), on forest GPP, and disentangled the impact of various factors on forest GPP in Phase II (2001-2010) and Phase III (2011-2018). We found that industrialization and urbanization slightly changed the total forest area, partly offsetting the ecological benefits of the afforestation project in Phase II, and forest GPP increased slowly. As a result, Rad became the dominant factor of forest GPP increase (the cumulative contribution of 25.68 TgC in 10 years, accounting for 33.51%). In contrast, in Phase III, due to the further expansion of the afforestation area and the natural growth of earlier planted forests, the forest GPP increased rapidly, as did the contribution of LCC. Finally, LCC replaced Rad to become the primary contributor (the cumulative contribution of 114.42 TgC in 8 years, accounting for 60.51%) to the forest GPP increase. During the whole study period, Ta contributed insignificantly to the variation in forest GPP, while to some extent VPD decreased the forest GPP (-12.90% and-4.11% of the contributions in the two phases, respectively). The results suggest that the emergence of ecological benefits of afforestation projects requires a certain time length and forestation scale. Our study provides a basis for formulating effective land use policies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available