4.7 Article

The importance of marshes providing soil stabilization to resist fast-flow erosion in case of a dike breach

Journal

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2622

Keywords

ecosystem conservation; ecosystem services; ecosystem-based coastal defense; flood protection; flow erosion; overtopping; sediment erosion; soil surface erosion; top erosion; wave run up

Funding

  1. Deltares
  2. Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management (RWS)
  3. Hoogheemraadschap Hollands Noorderkwartier (HHNK)
  4. HKV consultants
  5. it Fryske Gea
  6. Natuurmonumenten
  7. Noorderzijlvest
  8. NWO
  9. Perspectief Research Programme All-Risk [P15-21]
  10. Stichting Toegepast Onderzoek Waterbeheer
  11. Waterschap Vechtstromen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salt marshes with erosion-resistant topsoil play a crucial role in reducing breach dimensions if dikes fail. The presence of a top layer with high organic content, high water content, and low bulk density contributes to the erosion resistance of salt marshes. The fine root density is a key factor in predicting erosion resistance. It is recommended to use fine-grained sediments or a mixture of sand with silt or clay for future marsh creations.
Salt marshes provide valuable ecosystem services including coastal protection by reducing wave loading on dikes and seawalls. If the topsoil is erosion resistant to fast-flowing water, it may also reduce breach depth if a dike fails. In this experiment, we quantified the topsoil erosion resistance from marshes and bare tidal flats with different soil types to understand the extent to which they can help reduce breach depth. Intact soil samples were collected from 11 locations in the Netherlands at different tidal elevations and then exposed for 3 h to 2.3 m/s currents. To the samples that remained stable after flow exposure, an artificial crack was made to test their stability following soil disturbance. All samples from the tidal flats were completely eroded, regardless of sediment type. In contrast, all samples from well-established marsh plateaus were stable as long as no disturbances were made, including those with sandy subsoils. After creating artificial cracks, samples with a thin cohesive top layer on top of sandy subsoil collapsed, while marshes with silty subsoils remained stable. Pioneer marshes on sandy substrate without a cohesive top layer were the only vegetated soils that completely eroded. The lower erosion of marshes with either sandy or silty soils compared to bare tidal flats was best explained by the presence of a top layer with belowground biomass, high organic content, high water content, and low bulk density. When analyzing the erodibility of marshes only, fine root density was the best predictor of erosion resistance. This study demonstrates the importance of preserving, restoring, or creating salt marshes, to obtain a topsoil that is erosion resistant under fast-flowing water, which helps reduce breach dimensions if a dike fails. The probability of topsoil erosion in established marshes with sandy subsoil is higher than in silty marshes. A silty layer of cohesive sediment on top of the sand provides extra erosion resistance as long as it does not break. Pioneer marshes that have not developed a cohesive top layer are erosion sensitive, especially in sandy soils. For future marsh creations, using fine-grained sediments or a mixture of sand with silt or clay is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available