4.7 Article

Using near-term forecasts and uncertainty partitioning to inform prediction of oligotrophic lake cyanobacterial density

Journal

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2590

Keywords

algae; Bayesian model; blooms; ecological forecasting; hindcast; lake; oligotrophic; phytoplankton; scums; state-space model; uncertainty partitioning; variance partitioning

Funding

  1. Auburn Water District/Lewiston Water Division
  2. Bates College
  3. Dartmouth College
  4. Division of Biological Infrastructure [0434684, 1933016]
  5. Division of Computer and Network Systems [1737424]
  6. Division of Emerging Frontiers [0842112, 0842125, 0842267]
  7. Division of Environmental Biology [0749022, 1010862, 1137327, 1638577, 1702991, 1753639, MSB-1638575, MSB-1926050]
  8. Lake Sunapee Protective Assocation
  9. Midge Eliassen Fellowship
  10. NSF, United States National Science Foundation [CNS-1737424, DBI-0434684, DEB-0749022, DEB-1010862, EF-0842112, EF-0842125, EF-0842267, EF-1137327, EF-1638577, EF-1702991, ICER-1517823, MSB EF-1638575]
  11. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  12. Virginia Water Resources Research Center
  13. Direct For Biological Sciences
  14. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1933016, 0434684] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  15. Direct For Biological Sciences
  16. Emerging Frontiers [0842125] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  17. Direct For Biological Sciences
  18. Emerging Frontiers [0842112, 0842267] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  19. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  20. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1737424] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  21. Division Of Environmental Biology
  22. Direct For Biological Sciences [1638577, 1010862, 1702991] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  23. Division Of Environmental Biology
  24. Direct For Biological Sciences [1137327, 0749022, 1753639] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Near-term ecological forecasts provide advance notice of changes in ecosystem services and uncertainty partitioning helps improve forecast skill and guide interpretation. The study found that model process specification and initial conditions dominate forecast uncertainty and suggested long-term studies and improved observation protocols for better predictions.
Near-term ecological forecasts provide resource managers advance notice of changes in ecosystem services, such as fisheries stocks, timber yields, or water quality. Importantly, ecological forecasts can identify where there is uncertainty in the forecasting system, which is necessary to improve forecast skill and guide interpretation of forecast results. Uncertainty partitioning identifies the relative contributions to total forecast variance introduced by different sources, including specification of the model structure, errors in driver data, and estimation of current states (initial conditions). Uncertainty partitioning could be particularly useful in improving forecasts of highly variable cyanobacterial densities, which are difficult to predict and present a persistent challenge for lake managers. As cyanobacteria can produce toxic and unsightly surface scums, advance warning when cyanobacterial densities are increasing could help managers mitigate water quality issues. Here, we fit 13 Bayesian state-space models to evaluate different hypotheses about cyanobacterial densities in a low nutrient lake that experiences sporadic surface scums of the toxin-producing cyanobacterium, Gloeotrichia echinulata. We used data from several summers of weekly cyanobacteria samples to identify dominant sources of uncertainty for near-term (1- to 4-week) forecasts of G. echinulata densities. Water temperature was an important predictor of cyanobacterial densities during model fitting and at the 4-week forecast horizon. However, no physical covariates improved model performance over a simple model including the previous week's densities in 1-week-ahead forecasts. Even the best fit models exhibited large variance in forecasted cyanobacterial densities and did not capture rare peak occurrences, indicating that significant explanatory variables when fitting models to historical data are not always effective for forecasting. Uncertainty partitioning revealed that model process specification and initial conditions dominated forecast uncertainty. These findings indicate that long-term studies of different cyanobacterial life stages and movement in the water column as well as measurements of drivers relevant to different life stages could improve model process representation of cyanobacteria abundance. In addition, improved observation protocols could better define initial conditions and reduce spatial misalignment of environmental data and cyanobacteria observations. Our results emphasize the importance of ecological forecasting principles and uncertainty partitioning to refine and understand predictive capacity across ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available