Journal
DYSPHAGIA
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 159-170Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-022-10434-4
Keywords
Deglutition; Patient-reported outcomes; MDADI; Head and neck cancer; Cancer-related dysphagia; Treatment-related dysphagia
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to investigate changes in M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores in patients with naso- and oropharynx cancer after radiochemotherapy using IMRT with sparing of swallowing organs at risk (SWOARs). The results showed a slight decline in MDADI scores after treatment in the optimal group, and a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the adequate/poor group. Therefore, dose optimization to SWOARs can minimize treatment-related symptoms in patients with optimal deglutition-related quality of life and help those with adequate/poor deglutition-related quality of life recover from cancer dysphagia.
Objectives To prospectively investigate changes in M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores in patients affected by naso- and oropharynx cancer after definitive radiochemotherapy (ChemoRT) using swallowing organs at risk (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT. Methods MDADI questionnaires were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. MDADI scores were categorized as follows: >= 80 optimal, 80-60 adequate, < 60 poor deglutition-related quality of life (QoL) group, and dichotomized as optimal vs adequate/poor for the analysis. A mean MDADI composite (MDADI-C) change of 10 points was considered as minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results Sixty-three patients were enrolled of which 47 were considered for the analysis. At baseline, 26 (55%) were optimal and 21 (45%) were adequate/poor. The mean baseline MDADI-C score was 93.6 dropping to 81 at 6 months (p = 0.013) and slightly rising to 85.5 at 12 months (p = 0.321) for the optimal group. Indeed, the mean baseline MDADI-C score was 64.3 rising to 77.5 at 6 months (p = 0.006) and stabilizing at 76 at 12 months (p = 0.999) for the adequate/poor group. A statistically significant but not clinically relevant worsening of the MDADI-C score was reported for the optimal group, whereas both a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement of the MDADI-C score were reported for the adequate/poor group from before to post-treatment. Conclusion Our results suggest a doubly clinical benefit of dose optimization to SWOARs to minimize the RT sequalae in patients with a baseline optimal deglutition-related QoL and to recover from cancer dysphagia in those with a baseline adequate/poor deglutition-related QoL.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available