4.3 Article

Frequency of natural antibodies and concordance analysis for anti-TOXOPLASMA IgM tests in Colombian sera of pregnant women

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115733

Keywords

IgM anti-Toxoplasma; diagnosis; ELFA; ELISA; chemiluminescence

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia (Colombia) [773-2018, 837-2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interpretation of IgM anti-Toxoplasma can be problematic due to the presence of natural IgM. This study analyzed 1,503 sera and established natural and false-positive results. The concordance between ELISA and two semi-automatized systems was calculated, and it was found that ELISA had poor concordance. Automated assays are recommended for measuring IgM anti-Toxoplasma.
Interpretation of IgM anti-Toxoplasma can be problematic given the phenomena of natural IgM. We analyzed 1,503 sera obtained during prenatal care program, and we established natural and false-positive results by doing follow-up. In 101 samples the concordance between enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and two semi-automatized systems: electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELECSYS) and vitek immunodiagnostic assay system (MIDAS) was calculated. In 1,503 serum, 71 (4,7%) had ELISA IgG negative and ELISA IgM positive results and in 44 of these had a second sample 4 weeks later. In second samples, 27 (61,3 %) were IgM and IgG negative (false positive result in the first sample) and 13 (29,5%) were ELISA IgM positive and IgG negative (natural IgM). ELISA assay had a poor concordance with enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay as well as ELECSYS tests, contrarily, enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay and ELECSYS had optimal concordance, with 100 of 101 sera obtaining the same result by both tests. We recommended to use automatized assays to measure IgM anti-Toxoplasma. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available