4.5 Article

Comparison of renal outcomes between sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109231

Keywords

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; Renal outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By comparing the effects of SGLT2i and GLP1Ra treatments on patients with type 2 diabetes, this study found that the renal composite outcome incidence was lower in the SGLT2i-treated group, with smaller changes in eGFR.
Aims: This study aimed to clarify the differences in how sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1Ra) influence kidney function in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: We retrospectively built two databases of patients with T2DM who visited the clinics of members of Kanagawa Physicians Association. We defined the renal composite outcome as either progression of albuminuria status and/or > 15% deterioration in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) per year. We used propensity score matching to compare patient outcomes after SGLT2i and GLP1Ra treatments. Results: The incidence of renal composite outcomes was significantly lower in SGLT2i-treated patients than in GLP1Ra-treated patients (n = 15 [11%] and n = 27 [20%], respectively, P = 0.001). Annual eGFR changes (mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year) between the two groups differed significantly (-1.8 [95 %CI, -2.7, -0.9] in SGLT2i-treated patients and -3.4 [95 %CI, -4.6, -2.2] in GLP1Ra-treated patients, P = 0.0049). The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio changed owing to a significant interaction between the presence or absence of a decrease in systolic blood pressure and the difference in treatments (P < 0.04). Conclusion: Renal composite outcome incidence was lower in SGLT2i-treated patients than in GLP1Ra-treated patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available