4.7 Article

Multiplex social influence in a freemium context: Evidence from online social games

Journal

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113711

Keywords

Online social game; Freemium model; Premium features; Social networks; Social influence

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71972168, 71931009, 72033003, 71821002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of social influence on users' spending time and spending money in a freemium model. The findings reveal that spending time has a stronger effect on spending money, and personal characteristics and network measures moderate this multiplex social influence.
An increasingly popular trend in digital businesses is the adoption of the freemium model, in which premium features are provided along with free features. Because this model separates use (spending time) from purchase decisions (spending money) and people treat spending time and spending money differently, it derives two distinct types of social influence: social influence from peer spending time and peer spending money. This multiplex social influence, however, has not received sufficient attention. We investigated a popular online social game and studied how multiplex social influence jointly affects players' spending time and spending money in a digital freemium environment. We uncovered spending time has a more substantial effect on players' spending money than does spending money. The dependence between two different types of social influence provides evidence of multiplex social influence and its asymmetricity. We further tested and discovered that personal characteristics and network measures moderates multiplex social influence. Because the freemium model proliferates in many online environments, the current study enlightens the value of free users' social influence in the operations of businesses with freemium models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available