4.8 Article

Astrocytic GABA transporter controls sleep by modulating GABAergic signaling in Drosophila circadian neurons

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 1895-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.066

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MIRA award from the National Institute of General Medicine Sciences [1R35GM118087]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS053538]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the role of astrocytic GABA transporter (GAT) in sleep regulation in fruit flies was examined. It was found that GAT controls the amount and quality of sleep through modulation of GABAergic tone and activation of RDL.
A precise balance between sleep and wakefulness is essential to sustain a good quality of life and optimal brain function. GABA is known to play a key and conserved role in sleep control, and GABAergic tone should, therefore, be tightly controlled in sleep circuits. Here, we examined the role of the astrocytic GABA transporter (GAT) in sleep regulation using Drosophila melanogaster. We found that a hypomorphic gat mutation (gat(33-1)) increased sleep amount, decreased sleep latency, and increased sleep consolidation at night. Interestingly, sleep defects were suppressed when gat(33-1) was combined with a mutation disrupting wide-awake (wake), a gene that regulates the cell-surface levels of the GABA(A) receptor resistance to dieldrin (RDL) in the wake-promoting large ventral lateral neurons (l-LNvs). Moreover, RNAi knockdown of rdl and its modulators dnlg4 and wake in these circadian neurons also suppressed gat(33-1) sleep phenotypes. Brain immunohistochemistry showed that GAT-expressing astrocytes were located near RDL-positive l-LNv cell bodies and dendritic processes. We concluded that astrocytic GAT decreases GABAergic tone and RDL activation in arousal-promoting LNvs, thus determining proper sleep amount and quality in Drosophila.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available