4.7 Article

Effects of microstructure on corrosion behaviors for RE2SiO5 (RE=Gd, Y, Er) environmental barrier coatings against calcium-magnesium-alumino-silicate melts

Journal

CORROSION SCIENCE
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110174

Keywords

Rare-earth silicates; Environmental barrier coatings; CMAS corrosion behaviors; Corrosion mechanisms

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-VI-0020-0092]
  2. Shanghai Sailing Program [19YF1453900]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [20ZR1465700]
  4. Basic Research of the Ministry of Science and Tech-nology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [CXJJ-21S029]
  5. Science Fund of Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Materials and Green Manufacturing (Yantai) [AMGM2021A09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The corrosion behaviors and mechanisms of plasma-sprayed X1-Gd2SiO5 and X2-RE2SiO5 environmental barrier coatings against CMAS melts at 1400°C were investigated. The results showed that the RE2SiO5 coatings dissolved into CMAS melts and formed a continuous apatite phase layer at the interface. In addition, garnet phase was observed only in the X2-Er2SiO5 coating. The corrosion resistance of RE2SiO5 was affected by its microstructure and RE ionic radius.
The corrosion behaviors and mechanisms of plasma-sprayed X1-Gd2SiO5 and X2-RE2SiO5 (RE=Y, Er) environmental barrier coatings against CMAS melts at 1400 C were explored. Results showed that the RE2SiO5 coatings dissolved into CMAS melts and formed a continuous dense layer of apatite phase at the interface, while garnet phase was only found in the X2-Er2SiO5 coating. The recession of RE2SiO5 was related to its microstructure and RE ionic radius. The RE2SiO5 with X2 phase and smaller RE ionic radius exhibited better corrosion resistance due to its more stable crystal structure, lower reactivity with CMAS and easier to form garnet phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available