4.5 Article

Microborings in Jurassic scleractinians: a glimpse into the ancient coral skeleton microbiome

Journal

CORAL REEFS
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 863-867

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-022-02248-5

Keywords

Scleractinia; Chlorophyta; Microendoliths; Microbial biome; Ostreobium; Ichnoreticulina

Funding

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2016/23/N/ST10/01334]
  2. Jagiellonian University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Boring microorganisms are important for coral health and reef resilience. A study on Upper Jurassic corals in Poland revealed that the most common microorganism inhabiting the coral skeleton was a green alga adapted for a low-light environment. This finding provides insights into the oldest known scleractinian skeleton microbiome.
Boring microorganisms (microendoliths) are ubiquitous in living corals, constituting the skeleton microbiome important for coral health and reef resilience. Numerous microborings were recognized in Upper Jurassic (ca. 160 million years ago) corals (Pomerania, Poland) providing a glimpse into the oldest scleractinian skeleton microbiome so far. Scanning electron microscope study of resin casts of microborings (ca. 4 mu m) revealed that they represent mostly the ichnospecies Ichnoreticulina elegans, commonly considered as traces of Ostreobium quekettii, an alga adapted for a low-light environment. The distribution pattern of microborings (occurrence in the inner part of the skeletal elements, commonly upward orientation) implies that they were not done post-mortem, but by microendoliths inhabiting the coral skeleton during coral life. These findings imply that the most common boring microorganism inhabiting the skeleton of Jurassic corals was, like in modern corals, O. quekettii or a similar green alga. The microbiome of dead parts of modern living colonies revealed by analysis of microborings is an unexplored, but is a perspective topic for research by reef biologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available