4.7 Article

Finite strain FE2 analysis with data-driven homogenization using deep neural networks

Journal

COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106742

Keywords

Finite strain homogenization; Deep neural networks; Data-driven methods; Hyperelasticity; FE2 analysis

Funding

  1. USNational Science Foundation [CMMI-1762277]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a data-driven deep neural network (DNN) approach to accelerate FE2 analysis. By using DNN surrogate models for nonlinear homogenization, the computational burden can be reduced. Two training methods are compared, and the results show that Sobolev training achieves higher accuracy.
A data-driven deep neural network (DNN) based approach is presented to accelerate FE2 analysis. It is computationally expensive to perform multiscale FE2 analysis since at each macroscopic integration point an independent microscopic finite element analysis is needed. To alleviate this computational burden, DNN based surrogates are proposed for nonlinear homogenization that can serve as effective macroscale material models. A probabilistic approach is considered for surrogates' development, and an efficient data sampling strategy from the macroscopic deformation space is used for generating training and validation datasets. Frame indifference of macroscopic material behavior is consistently handled, and two training methods - regular training where only input/output pairs are included in the training dataset via L-2 loss function, and Sobolev training where the derivative data is also used with the Sobolev loss function - are compared. Numerical results demonstrate that Sobolev training leads to a higher testing accuracy as compared to regular training, and DNNs can serve as efficient and accurate surrogates for nonlinear homogenization in computationally expensive multiscale FE2 analysis. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available