4.7 Article

From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education

Journal

COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inspired by the digitalization during the Covid-19 crisis, this study investigates the emergence of a digital learning space in higher education. Through analyzing three phases of digitalization at the University of Oslo, three underlying forces of the digital learning space were identified: alignment of digital education and digital subjects, redefinition of roles between students and teachers, and the ability to engage with the broader society.
Inspired by the fast digitalization during the Covid-19 crisis, we investigate a key aspect of digital transformation of higher education - the emergence of a digital learning space. In developing our analysis, we focus on two streams of digitalization in higher education; digitalization of education and digitalization of subjects. We call this dual digitalization, which has been an obstacle for digital transformation of the sector, and made it challenging to develop a shared digital space. Our research question is, how can we develop a shared digital learning space in higher education? We conducted our study at the University of Oslo, where we analyzed three phases of digitalization. We identified three underlying forces of the digital learning space. First, the alignment of digital education and digital subjects provided a technical foundation. Second, the digital learning space was enacted and harnessed by redefinition of roles between students and teachers, allowing for new and deeper learning forms. And third, the digital learning space enables universities to transcend the physical and institutional borders, and engage in interactions with the broader society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available