4.6 Article

Optimal design of a hybrid renewable energy system with grid connection and comparison of techno-economic performances with an off-grid system: A case study of West China

Journal

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107657

Keywords

Hybrid renewable energy system; Off-grid; On-grid; Rural electrification; West China

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development of China [2019YFE0100100]
  2. BP
  3. Tsinghua University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper demonstrates the techno-economic feasibility and flexibility of hybrid renewable energy systems for rural electrification, using a case study of a village in West China. The results show that a hybrid system comprising solar, wind, and biomass is reliable, cost-effective, and brings environmental and social benefits.
Reliable and sustainable power supply for remote rural areas is of vital importance for development of these areas. In this paper, the techno-economic feasibility and flexibility of hybrid renewable energy systems are demonstrated under both off-grid and on-grid modes for rural electrification, where a case study of a village in West China is presented. According to simulation and optimization results as well as sensitivity analysis, the most cost-competitive configuration is found by Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy resources (HOMER). Comparison of the off-grid and on-grid modes of the hybrid system has been carried out. The results demonstrate that a hybrid renewable energy system which comprises solar, wind and biomass is reliable and cost-effective regarding sustainable rural electrification. Moreover, environmental and social benefits can also be acquired by this system. The high capability of the proposed flexible design is demonstrated over conditions for both off-grid and on-grid modes. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available