4.6 Article

Mean squared error criterion for model-based design of experiments with subset selection

Journal

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107667

Keywords

Model-based design of experiments; Parameter subset selection; Parameter estimation; Biased estimation; Mean squared error criterion

Funding

  1. Dankook University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a new optimality criterion for model-based design of experiments, which can address the issues encountered by conventional criteria in practical systems. Results from a comparative experiment using a linear example demonstrate that the proposed criterion outperforms the conventional ones in all cases.
Model-based design of experiments (MBDoE) has been widely used for efficient development of mathematical models, which can then be used for various applications for real world systems. The conventional optimality criteria for MBDoE can suffer from ill-conditioning of design matrix, which can be easily encountered in practical systems. To alleviate this problem, in this work, an alternative optimality criterion is proposed, whose formulation depends on mean squared error of biased estimators obtained by parameter subset selection. Such formulation is applied to subset selection methods by ranking and by transformation. Then, using an illustrative linear example, the performance of the proposed criterion is compared with three conventional criteria: A-, D-, and E-optimality criteria. Through the case study, it is shown that the proposed criterion can outperform the conventional ones in all the cases, generating linear models with smaller prediction errors, and it can provide better results with subset selection by transformation. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available