4.7 Article

Efficient Parallel Thinning of 3d Objects on the Body-centered Cubic Lattice

Journal

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2022.103328

Keywords

Body-centered cubic grid; Parallel thinning; Skeletonization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a thinning method to extract one-dimensional skeletons from discrete objects on the body-centered cubic lattice. By introducing stronger conditions, including the removal of topological invariant points in a parallelized process, the thinning process becomes faster. Moreover, distance information and an optional pruning mechanism are introduced to improve the quality of the resulting skeletons.
We consider thinning methods to extract one dimensional skeletons from discrete objects defined on the body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice. In Strand (2004), a condition has been given that guarantees the preservation of the object's topology in such a thinning process. In this paper, we present stronger conditions that even allow the topological invariant point removal in a parallelized process. These conditions for p-simplicity can be efficiently evaluated which leads to a very fast thinning process. We show that p-simplicity is a new concept that cannot be obtained by adapting the checking plane conditions of Tsao and Fu to the bcc lattice. Furthermore, we introduce distance information and an optional pruning mechanism into the thinning process to improve the quality of the resulting skeletons. The presented results show that our method generates high quality skeletons that reproduce the symmetries of the models even under the condition of added noise and contain only very few spurious branches. The presented running times demonstrate the linear run-time behavior of our algorithm and the speedup that is achieved by the parallelization. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available