4.7 Article

Direct FE2 modeling of heterogeneous materials with a micromorphic computational homogenization framework

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.114837

Keywords

Multiscale modeling; Generalized continua; Micromorphic theory; Composites; Size effects

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Singapore [R-265-000-650-114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a concurrent multilevel modeling approach called Direct FE2, which connects the macroscopic and microscopic behaviors of materials and allows for accurate prediction of deformation in composite materials.
Direct FE2, recently proposed by Tan et al. (2020), is a concurrent multilevel modeling approach, which homogenizes a representative volume element (RVE) to a Cauchy continuum but calls for only a single finite element analysis. In this paper, the method is extended to homogenization towards a micromorphic continuum. It allows us to capture the deformation of composites with soft inclusions in the absence of scale separation and the size effects therein. Besides the displacement field, additional morphic fields are employed at the macroscale to characterize the micro-scale heterogeneity. Compared with the classical FE2 approach, the only effort in the development of the Direct FE2 is to formulate the macro-micro transition as kinematic constraints between the macro and micro DOFs, that are implemented through multi-point constraints (MPC) in Abaqus (R). Automatically, the MPCs enable the micro-macro transition in an energetically consistent way and correlate the microscopic traction back to the macroscopic nodal internal force. The performance of the novel Direct FE2 modeling is benchmarked with three representative numerical simulations, where a better predictive capability than the classical one is demonstrated in situations without a clear separation of scales. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available