☆ 4.1 Review

Reporting of absolute and relative risk measures in oral health and cardiovascular events studies: A systematic review

COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Severe Periodontal Disease Increases Acute Myocardial Infarction and Stroke: A 10-Year Retrospective Follow-up Study

H. J. Cho et al.

Summary: After controlling for various confounders, the study found a significant association between severe periodontal disease (SPD) and the incidence of AMI and stroke in the Korean population, particularly with a higher impact on females and adults aged 40 to 59 years. The data confirmed that SPD was causally associated with the new events of AMI and stroke, increasing total AMI events by 4.3%, total stroke events by 1.4%, and total major adverse cardiovascular events by 1.6% in the total Korean population.

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH (2021)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Methodological Gaps in Studying the Oral-Systemic Disease Connection

E. Raittio et al.

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Urology & Nephrology

Evidence-based urology: importance of relative vs absolute effect

Lambertus P. W. Witte et al.

Summary: In order to effectively apply research evidence, especially the results of clinical trials, to daily patient care, clinicians need to understand the magnitude of treatment benefits and harms, and the ways authors may express that magnitude. Authors may choose to express outcomes using relative, absolute, or a combination of both measures. Absolute effects are more significant for patients in understanding the risk of outcomes when untreated and how treatment can improve that risk.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Reporting only relative effect measures was potentially misleading: some good practices for improving the soundness of epidemiological results

Marco Novelli et al.

Summary: In medical and epidemiological literature, there is a trend towards reporting excessive decimal digits, which may lead to misleading information especially with small relative occurrence measures. It is suggested to use one or two decimal digits for estimating relative risks close to 1, depending on the background absolute rate. Reporting both relative and absolute risk measures is recommended, with the use of more than two decimal digits justified only for high background rates.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Oral Health and Cardiovascular Disease: Mapping Clinical Heterogeneity and Methodological Gaps

M. Aldossri et al.

Summary: The relationship between poor oral health and cardiovascular disease has been extensively studied over the past 25 years, resulting in a broad and heterogeneous field with significant clinical heterogeneity and methodological gaps. There is a need for a universally accepted conceptual framework to define oral health and cardiovascular disease outcomes consistently, and to utilize emerging research methods to enhance the impact of research in this area.

JDR CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

GRADE guidelines 27: how to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in summary of findings tables and Evidence Profiles

Nicole Skoetz et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Peripheral Vascular Disease

Relative vs absolute risk and odds: Understanding the difference

Michael R. Jiroutek et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION (2019)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Promoting oral health care because of its possible effect on systemic disease is

Bruce L. Pihlstrom et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts

Arnav Agarwal et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Transplantation

Relative risk versus absolute risk: one cannot be interpreted without the other

Marlies Noordzij et al.

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Clinicians' Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests A Systematic Review

Tammy C. Hoffmann et al.

JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2017)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Restricted Mean Survival Time as a Measure to Interpret Clinical Trial Results

Dae Hyun Kim et al.

JAMA CARDIOLOGY (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Systematic reviews experience major limitations in reporting absolute effects

Pablo Alonso-Coello et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Surveys on Reporting Guideline Usage in Dental Journals

F. Hua et al.

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Patients' Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests A Systematic Review

Tammy C. Hoffmann et al.

JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Evidence-Based Risk Communication A Systematic Review

Daniella A. Zipkin et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Endpoint Selection and Relative (Versus Absolute) Risk Reporting in Published Medication Trials

Michael Hochman et al.

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2011)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Oncology

Helping Patients Decide: Ten Steps to Better Risk Communication

Angela Fagerlin et al.

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2011)

Add to Collection

Article Medical Informatics

Laypersons' understanding of relative risk reductions: Randomised cross-sectional study

Lene Sorensen et al.

BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING (2008)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration

Jan P. Vandenbroucke et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2007)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Ratio measures in leading medical journals: structured review of accessibility of underlying absolute risks

Lisa M. Schwartz et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2006)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Are preventive drugs preventive enough? A study of patients' expectation of benefit from preventive drugs

PN Trewby et al.

CLINICAL MEDICINE (2002)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Journal reading habits of internists

S Saint et al.

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2000)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.