4.3 Article

Potassium Fulvate for Improving Nutrient Status, Photosynthesis, and Agronomic Traits of Maize

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS
Volume 53, Issue 13, Pages 1607-1622

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2022.2063309

Keywords

Leonardite; nutrient concentration; potassium fulvate; sand soil

Funding

  1. 50th anniversary Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of potassium fulvate (KF) derived from leonardite and chemical fertilizers (CF) has been found to effectively improve the growth and nutrient status of maize in sand soil, resulting in increased biomass.
Potassium fulvate (KF) is salt form of fulvic acids and has a functional role to improve plant growth and soil quality. Its response under reduced soil fertility is less reported, particularly in sand soil. We examined the beneficial effects of KF derived from leonardite when used with chemical fertilizers (CF) on maize's nutrient status, photosynthetic and agronomic traits in sand soil. KF, often extracted from leonardite, was applied to maize seedlings in four treatments. Composition and functional groups of KF found in leonardite were similar to fulvic acids extracted from other sources, and resulted in nutrient adsorption such as potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) uptake in shoot. Applying KF with CF enhanced the physiological and growth traits as well as biomass of maize compared to the application of CF alone. Further, KF with 75% CF produced results comparable to that of 100% CF alone. KF improved plant nutrition, enhanced photosynthetic parameters and growth traits, and increased the biomass of maize when CF application was reduced by 25% from the recommended amount. Thus, the application of KF with CF is the practical guideline for using CF for maize production in low fertility sand soil conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available