4.3 Review

Influence of surgical technique in donor hepatectomy on immediate and short-term living donor outcomes - A systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis, and expert panel recommendations

Journal

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14703

Keywords

complication; ERAS; living liver donation; minimally invasive

Funding

  1. International Liver Transplant Society (ILTS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify whether surgical technique influences immediate and short-term outcomes after living liver donation surgery. The study found that left donor hepatectomy is associated with improved short-term outcomes compared to right hepatectomy. Right donor hepatectomy with or without middle hepatic vein has equivalent outcomes. There is no difference in outcomes related to incision type, minimally invasive vs. open.
Background: There are currently no guidelines pertaining to ERAS pathways in living donor hepatectomy. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify whether surgical technique influences immediate and short-term outcomes after living liver donation surgery. Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel (CRD42021260707). Endpoints were mortality, overall complications, serious complications, bile eaks, pulmonary complications, estimated blood loss and length of stay. Results: Of the 2410 screened articles, 21 articles were included for final analysis; three observational, 13 retrospective cohort, four prospective cohort studies, and one randomized trial. Overall complications were higher with right versus left hepatectomy (26.8% vs. 20.8%; OR 1.4, P = .010). Donors after left hepatectomy had shorter length of stay (MD 1.4 days) compared to right hepatectomy. There was no difference in outcomes after right donor hepatectomy with versus without middle hepatic vein. We had limited data on the influence of incision type and minimally invasive approaches on living donor outcomes, and no data on the effect of operative time on donor outcomes. Conclusions: Left donor hepatectomy should be preferred over right hepatectomy, as it is related to improved donor short-term outcomes (QOE; Moderate | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Right donor hepatectomy with or without MHV has equivalent outcomes (QOE; Moderate | Grade of Recommendation; Strong); no preference is recommended, decision should be based on program's experience and expertise. No difference in outcomes was observed related to incision type, minimally invasive vs. open (QOE; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Weak); no preference can be recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available