4.3 Review

Association of Corticosteroid Treatment With Outcomes in Pediatric Patients With Bacterial Meningitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 551-564

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.02.008

Keywords

bacterial meningitis; children; corticosteroid; meta-analysis; randomized clinical trial; subgroup analysis

Funding

  1. Capital Medical University Basic Clinical ResearchCooperation Project [17JL08]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [2018ZX09721003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of corticosteroids for the treatment of pediatric bacterial meningitis has been controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the benefits and risks of corticosteroids in this context. The findings showed that corticosteroid treatment reduced the risk of hearing loss but had no significant benefit in preventing neurologic sequelae. Low-dose corticosteroids were found to be more effective than high-dose corticosteroids. However, the use of corticosteroids was associated with an increased risk of secondary fever. Additionally, corticosteroids significantly shortened the duration of fever. There was no significant difference in mortality rate and reactive arthritis between the corticosteroid and control groups.
Purpose: Controversy has arisen among the overall benefit and potential risks in the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of pediatric bacterial meningitis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide evidence of the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other databases) were searched from inception until March 9, 2021. Randomized clinical trials focused on corticosteroids as adjuvant therapy in pediatric bacterial meningitis were considered eligible. The primary outcomes were hearing loss and neurologic sequelae. Secondary outcomes were mean days before resolution of fever, mortality, secondary fever, and reactive arthritis. Fixed- or random-effects models were used to evaluate the association between corticosteroids therapy and outcomes by calculating risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Two independent reviewers completed citation screening, data extraction, and risk assessment. Findings: Twenty-nine studies with 3433 patients were included. An obvious benefit was found in the treatment of corticosteroids in hearing loss (RR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.81;I-2 = 17%; P = 0.0006). No benefit was found in the rate of neurologic sequelae. However, obvious benefit was found in the low-dosage subgroup (0.6 mg/kg per day) (RR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.77; I-2 = 0%; P < 0.0001) but not in the high-dosage subgroup (0.8 mg/kg per day). An increasing rate of secondary fever was found when using corticosteroids (RR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.10-1.51; I-2 = 13%; P = 0.001). Corticosteroids could significantly decrease the mean days before resolution of fever (MD = -1.48; 95% CI, -1.79 to -1.17; I-2 = 84%, P < 0.00001). No difference was found in the rate of mortality and reactive arthritis. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available