4.5 Article

Evaluation of a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) for upper extremity function after stroke: The Mini-ARAT

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 36, Issue 9, Pages 1257-1266

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02692155221097322

Keywords

Stroke rehabilitation; motor function; upper limb assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. ETH Domain [2017-205, PHRT-205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to create a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test scale, investigate its psychometric properties compared to the original scale, and externally validate it within an independent cohort. The results showed that the Mini-ARAT is a time-effective tool that accurately captures the dynamics of motor deficits and provides important information for clinical and research purposes.
Objectives (i) to create a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test scale, (ii) to investigate its psychometric properties compared to the original scale and (iii) to externally validate it within an independent cohort. Design Prospective longitudinal cohort study. Settings Two University Hospitals (France, Switzerland). Participants 47 patients with poststroke motor deficits of the upper limb coming from two different sites were included and divided into two cohorts (n = 22 for the construction cohort; n = 25 for the validation cohort). Main Measures We used the first cohort to build the Mini-ARAT by shortening the Action Research Arm Test scale on the basis of ceiling/floor effects and collinearity of the subscales. We studied its reliability, validity, and responsiveness and performed an external validation with the second cohort. Results The Mini-ARAT consisted of 2 subscales from the original Action Research Arm Test scale (Grip and Pinch). Internal consistency (alpha = 87) and inter-rater reliability (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.01) were good and similar to those of the Action Research Arm Test scale. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Mini-ARAT was 9 points. The predictive validity in the construction and validation cohorts showed good correlation between the Mini-ARAT at baseline and the Fugl Meyer at 3 months (rho, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.49-0.90, p < 0.01, and 0.58, 0.19-0.96, p < 0.01). Conclusion The Mini-ARAT is a time-effective tool able to capture the dynamics of motor deficits with high reliability and consistency, providing excellent information about residual motor functions, which is critically important for clinical and research purposes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available