4.5 Article

Pathogenic variant-based preconception carrier screening in the Israeli Jewish population

Journal

CLINICAL GENETICS
Volume 101, Issue 5-6, Pages 517-529

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.14131

Keywords

at-risk couples rate; carrier frequency; Jewish population; NGS; pathogenic variants; preconception expanded pan-ethnic screening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used the Israeli Jewish population as a model to conduct carrier screening and confirmed the advantages of variant-based comprehensive screening in detecting carriers and at-risk couples in a diverse population.
Preconception carrier screening allows identification of couples at risk to have offspring with autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. In a current multiethnic world, screening based on self-reported ancestry has limitations. Here we describe the findings of a comprehensive pan-ethnic variant-based carrier screening, using the Israeli Jewish population as a model. The cohort included 1696 individuals (848 couples) tested with the 'MyScreen' multigene panel. The panel covers 1206 variants spanning 385 genes, known in different Jewish ethnicities and local Arab, Druze and Bedouin populations. Out of these, 205 variants in 143 genes are Jewish founder variants. We identified 859 (50.6%), carriers of at least one variant in 151 genes. Importantly, 569 (66.2%) of carriers could be missed by the current Israeli screening program. In total, 1:40 (2.5%) of carrier couples were identified by the 'MyScreen' panel, compared with 1:144 (0.7%) found by the ethnicity-based screening. Surprisingly, 90 individuals (10.5%) were carriers of variants unexpected for their reported origin, and 16 variants were previously unreported in Jewish patients. Our results support the advantages of variant-based comprehensive carrier screening for detection of carriers and at-risk couples in a diverse population with many founder disease-causing variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available