Journal
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 362-372Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008269
Keywords
hospital; ischemic stroke; Massachusetts; patient transfer; thrombectomy
Categories
Funding
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [K08 HS024561]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that factors such as shared hospital affiliation, hospital capabilities, and hospital reputation are important in determining the transfer destination of stroke patients, after accounting for distance and structural network characteristics.
Background: Patients with stroke are frequently transferred between hospitals. This may have implications on the quality of care received by patients; however, it is not well understood how the characteristics of sending and receiving hospitals affect the likelihood of a transfer event. Our objective was to identify hospital characteristics associated with sending and receiving patients with stroke. Methods: Using a comprehensive statewide administrative dataset, including all 78 Massachusetts hospitals, we identified all transfers of patients with ischemic stroke between October 2007 and September 2015 for this observational study. Hospital variables included reputation (US News and World Report ranking), capability (stroke center status, annual stroke volume, and trauma center designation), and institutional affiliation. We included network variables to control for the structure of hospital-to-hospital transfers. We used relational event modeling to account for complex temporal and relational dependencies associated with transfers. This method decomposes a series of patient transfers into a sequence of decisions characterized by transfer initiations and destinations, modeling them using a discrete-choice framework. Results: Among 73 114 ischemic stroke admissions there were 7189 (9.8%) transfers during the study period. After accounting for travel time between hospitals and structural network characteristics, factors associated with increased likelihood of being a receiving hospital (in descending order of relative effect size) included shared hospital affiliation (5.8x higher), teaching hospital status (4.2x higher), stroke center status (4.3x and 3.8x higher when of the same or higher status), and hospitals of the same or higher reputational ranking (1.5x higher). Conclusions: After accounting for distance and structural network characteristics, in descending order of importance, shared hospital affiliation, hospital capabilities, and hospital reputation were important factor in determining transfer destination of patients with stroke. This study provides a starting point for future research exploring how relational coordination between hospitals may ensure optimized allocation of patients with stroke for maximal patient benefit.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available