4.7 Article

Advances in Acute Ischemic Stroke Therapy

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 130, Issue 8, Pages 1230-1251

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319948

Keywords

cytoprotection; ischemic stroke; reperfusion; tenecteplase; thrombectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The treatment of acute ischemic stroke is advancing with intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and cytoprotection being investigated. Later treatment with alteplase and the use of tenecteplase are beneficial alternatives to alteplase. Cytoprotection as an adjunct to reperfusion has shown no efficacy in prior clinical trials, but may have potential benefits.
The treatment of acute ischemic stroke continues to advance. The mainstay of treatment remains intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase. Recent studies demonstrated that later treatment with alteplase is beneficial in patients selected with advanced imaging techniques. Tenecteplase has been evaluated as an alternative thrombolytic drug and evidence suggests that it is as least as effective as alteplase and may lyse large vessel clots more effectively. Endovascular therapy with mechanical thrombectomy has now been shown to be beneficial up to 24 hours after stroke onset in carefully selected patients with proximal, large vessel occlusions. Ongoing studies are evaluating the effectiveness of thrombectomy in patients with more distal vessel occlusions and patients with proximal large vessel occlusions with larger ischemic core volumes and also in patients with milder neurological deficits. Cytoprotection is another potential acute stroke therapy that has not demonstrated efficacy in prior clinical trials. It should be reconsidered as an adjunct to reperfusion and a variety of new clinical trials can be envisioned to evaluate the potential benefits of cytoprotection in patients before and after reperfusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available