4.7 Article

Temporal Trends in Late Preterm and Early Term Birth Rates in 6 High-Income Countries in North America and Europe and Association With Clinician-Initiated Obstetric Interventions

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 316, Issue 4, Pages 410-419

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.9635

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. T32 Predoctoral Training Program in Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [T32HD052460]
  2. Paris Descartes University
  3. KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [26870889]
  4. Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [AMED-6013]
  5. NICHD of the NIH [K01HD074726]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26870889] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IMPORTANCE Clinicians have been urged to delay the use of obstetric interventions (eg, labor induction, cesarean delivery) until 39 weeks or later in the absence of maternal or fetal indications for intervention. OBJECTIVE To describe recent trends in late preterm and early term birth rates in 6 high-income countries and assess association with use of clinician-initiated obstetric interventions. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of singleton live births from 2006 to the latest available year (ranging from 2010 to 2015) in Canada, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the United States. EXPOSURES Use of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention (either labor induction or prelabor cesarean delivery) during delivery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Annual country-specific late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early term (37-38 weeks) birth rates. RESULTS The study population included 2 415 432 Canadian births in 2006-2014 (4.8% late preterm; 25.3% early term); 305 947 Danish births in 2006-2010 (3.6% late preterm; 18.8% early term); 571 937 Finnish births in 2006-2015 (3.3% late preterm; 16.8% early term); 468 954 Norwegian births in 2006-2013 (3.8% late preterm; 17.2% early term); 737 754 Swedish births in 2006-2012 (3.6% late preterm; 18.7% early term); and 25 788 558 US births in 2006-2014 (6.0% late preterm; 26.9% early term). Late preterm birth rates decreased in Norway (3.9% to 3.5%) and the United States (6.8% to 5.7%). Early term birth rates decreased in Norway (17.6% to 16.8%), Sweden (19.4% to 18.5%), and the United States (30.2% to 24.4%). In the United States, early term birth rates decreased from 33.0% in 2006 to 21.1% in 2014 among births with clinician-initiated obstetric intervention, and from 29.7% in 2006 to 27.1% in 2014 among births without clinician-initiated obstetric intervention. Rates of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention increased among late preterm births in Canada (28.0% to 37.9%), Denmark (22.2% to 25.0%), and Finland (25.1% to 38.5%), and among early term births in Denmark (38.4% to 43.8%) and Finland (29.8% to 40.1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Between 2006 and 2014, late preterm and early term birth rates decreased in the United States, and an association was observed between early term birth rates and decreasing clinician-initiated obstetric interventions. Late preterm births also decreased in Norway, and early term births decreased in Norway and Sweden. Clinician-initiated obstetric interventions increased in some countries but no association was found with rates of late preterm or early term birth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available