4.5 Article

Impact of composition ratio on the structure and optical properties of (1-x)MnFe2O4/(x)ZnMn2O4 nanocomposite

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS B
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ac600f

Keywords

MFO and ZMO composite; XPS; structure; optical

Funding

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/66]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The physical and chemical properties of MFO and ZMO nanocomposite samples with different ratios were studied, revealing a relationship between optical parameters and the content of the ZMO phase in the nanocomposite samples.
(1 - x)MnFe2O4 (MFO)/xZnMn(2)O(4) (ZMO) (x = 0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0) nanocomposite samples were prepared using co-precipitation procedure. The phase percentage, cell parameters, and crystallite size of MFO and ZMO phases in each nanocomposite sample were calculated using Rietveld refinement procedure. The x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy techniques established the variation in the lattice parameters of each phase are due to permutation of all cations among the octahedral and tetrahedral sites of MFO and ZMO. The different oxidation states of different ions in all samples were determined using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) technique. The variation in absorbance of the nanocomposite samples with composition parameter (x) is dependent on the wavelength region. The optical bandgap of the nanocomposite samples is decreased as the content of ZMO phase increased. The effect of alloying on the refractive index, extinction coefficient, dielectric constant, optical conductivity, and the nonlinear optical behaviors of all samples were studied in detail. The nanocomposite sample x = 0.5 disclosed upgraded optical parameters with the highest refractive index, optical conductivity, and PL intensity, which nominate it to be functional in various application fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available