4.7 Article

Exposure of e-waste dismantlers from a formal recycling facility in Spain to inhalable organophosphate and halogenated flame retardants

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 294, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133775

Keywords

E-waste; Indoor; Inhalation; Occupational exposure; Organophosphate esters; PBDEs

Funding

  1. MCIN/AEI [CEX 2018-000794-S]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [EXPOPLAS PID 2019-110576RB-I00, RTI2018098095-B-C21]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya -Consolidated Research Group Water and Soil Quality Unit [2017 SGR 1404]
  4. [PRE 2020-091979]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study measured the concentration levels of organophosphate esters (OPEs) and halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) in airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from an e-waste dismantling facility in Catalonia, Spain. It was found that OPEs were mainly present in the CRT dismantling area, while HFRs were mainly present in the grinding area. OPEs were also detected in solid e-waste from the facility. The estimated health risks from inhalation exposure were found to be low for the workers, but other routes of exposure may bring the risks closer to threshold values.
Concentration levels of 16 organophosphate esters (OPEs) and 18 halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) were measured in airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from an e-waste dismantling facility in Catalonia (Spain) to assess their occurrence, profiles and potential health risks. Three different areas from the facility were studied, including an area for cathodic ray-tube (CRT) TV dismantling, a grinding area, and the outdoor background. OPEs and HFRs were detected in all samples, with concentrations between 10.4 and 110 ng/m(3) for OPEs and from 0.72 to 2213 ng/m(3) for HFRs. The compounds with highest concentrations in both working areas were triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) and tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP) for OPEs and decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) for HFRs. Higher concentration levels were found in the CRT area compared to the grinding one, probably due to the lower ventilation and different types of e-waste being processed. OPEs were also detected in the solid e-waste from the facility, highlighting the need to evaluate pollutant levels in e-waste before proceeding to its re-use. Estimated daily intakes via inhalation during workday were calculated, as well as carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks, these being 25 and 50 times lower than threshold risk values in the worst cases, respectively. However, this calculated risk only considers the workday exposure via inhalation, while other routes of exposure (e.g., ingestion, dermal) could bring these values closer to threshold values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available