4.7 Article

Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and Cr(VI) adsorption performance of carbonaceous nanofibers derived from bacterial cellulose

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 291, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132976

Keywords

Biomass; Carbonized bacterial cellulose; Pyrolysis temperature; Cr(VI) adsorption

Funding

  1. National Nat-ural Science Foundation of China [51873087, 51803092]
  2. Natural Sci-ence Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [BK20180490]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that increasing pyrolysis temperature improved the properties and adsorption performance of carbonized bacterial cellulose, with the highest adsorption capacity reaching 250.0 mg/g. The adsorption mechanisms mainly involved electrostatic interaction, pi-pi interaction, and functional group complexation.
The effects of pyrolysis temperature on properties and adsorption performance of carbonized bacterial cellulose (CBC) produced from bacterial cellulose at 300, 400, 600 and 800 degrees C were investigated. As pyrolysis temperature increased, the BET surface area, C and ash contents of CBC increased while its mass yield and the contents of H, N and O decreased. Higher pyrolysis temperature resulted in CBC having more aromatic structure and less hydrophilic. The impacts of pyrolysis temperature, solution pH, contact time and initial concentration on the absorption of Cr(VI) onto CBC were systematically studied as well. The results showed that CBC400 prepared at 400 degrees C exhibited the highest Cr(VI) adsorption capacity for Cr(VI) up to 250.0 mg/g. The equilibrium adsorption and adsorption kinetics fitted the Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models well. The mechanisms of adsorption of Cr(VI) on CBC included electrostatic interaction, pi-pi interaction and functional groups complexation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available