4.7 Article

Bioelectricity generation from human urine and simultaneous nutrient recovery: Role of Microbial Fuel Cells

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133437

Keywords

Electricity generation; Microbial fuel cells; Nutrient recovery; Urine

Funding

  1. JK Science Technology & Innovation Council, Department of Science & Technology, India [JKSTIC/SRE/945-47]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the information on using microbial fuel cells (MFCs) fueled with urine to generate bioelectricity and recover value-added resources, and discusses the improvements, system operation, and factors enhancing the performance of MFCs.
Urine is a 'valuable waste' that can be exploited to generate bioelectricity and recover key nutrients for producing NPK-rich biofertilizers. In recent times, improved and innovative waste management technologies have emerged to manage the rapidly increasing environmental pollution and to accomplish the goal of sustainable development. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) have attracted the attention of environmentalists worldwide to treat human urine and produce power through bioelectrochemical reactions in presence of electroactive bacteria growing on the anode. The bacteria break down the complex organic matter present in urine into simpler compounds and release the electrons which flow through an external circuit generating current at the cathode. Many other useful products are harvested at the end of the process. So, in this review, an attempt has been made to synthesize the information on MFCs fuelled with urine to generate bioelectricity and recover value-added resources (nutrients), and their modifications to enhance productivity. Moreover, configuration and mode of system operation, and factors enhancing the performance of MFCs have been also presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available