4.6 Article

Mesoscale model of radial hydrodynamics for fluidizing small particles with low solid holdup in gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 250, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117413

Keywords

Radial hydrodynamics; Mesoscale; Gas-liquid-solid; Circulating fluidized bed; Modeling

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [22008169, 91834303]
  2. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems [MPCS2021-D-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed (GLSCFB) is an important reactor with critical radial hydrodynamics for industrial design and scale-up. A mesoscale method based on the energy-minimization multiscale principle is used to model the radial flow structures, which can reasonably predict the radial distributions of flow parameters and analyze the influence of operating conditions on radial hydrodynamics in GLSCFB.
Gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed (GLSCFB) is an important reactor. Radial hydrodynamics of GLSCFB are critical for the industrial design and scale-up, but the hydrodynamics have not been well described. To mechanically model the radial flow structures, a mesoscale method based on the energy-minimization multiscale principle is applied. A comparison between experimental data and model calculations shows that the radial mesoscale model can reasonably predict the radial distributions of the flow parameters and analyze the influence of the operating conditions on the radial hydrodynamics in GLSCFB for fluidizing solid particles of small diameters (d(p) <= 1 mm) and low solid holdup (epsilon(s) <= 15%). Additionally, model predictions show that the peak positions of the suspension and transportation energy consumed per unit mass of solid particles and liquid shear stress range from 0.75 to 0.9, which is an obvious indicator of the radial flow structure. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available