4.7 Article

Fused aromatic networks as a new class of gas hydrate inhibitors

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 433, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133691

Keywords

Porous organic polymers; Fused aromatic networks; Gas hydrates; Kinetic hydrate inhibitor; Methane

Funding

  1. Creative Research Initiative [2014R1A3A2069102, BK21 Plus (5120200413798), 2016R1A5A1009405, 2021R1A2C2005856]
  2. National Research Foun-dation (NRF) of Korea [2.210048.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fused aromatic networks (FANs) have attracted attention due to their electronic properties and stability. 3D organic networks and 2D layered structures were found to be effective gas hydrate inhibitors with outstanding stability under high-pressure/low-temperature conditions.
Fused aromatic networks (FANs) are attracting considerable interest in the scientific community because of their intriguing electronic properties and superior physiochemical stability due to their fully fused aromatic systems. Here, a three-dimensional (3D) cage-like organic network (3D-CON) and a vertical two-dimensional (2D) layered ladder structure (designated as V2D-BBL structure) were studied as materials for gas hydrate inhibitors because of their outstanding stability in high-pressure/low-temperature and periodically incorporated molecular building blocks. The V2D-BBL structure demonstrated remarkable performance, inhibiting the formation of both methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) hydrates, comparable to conventional lactam-based polymers. It was determined that the designed perinone moiety in the V2D-BBL structure enables synergistic interactions with the host (water) and guest (CH4) molecules involved in hydrate nucleation. Given their pre-designability and inherent stability, the FANs hold enormous potential as gas hydrate inhibitors for industrial applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available