4.7 Article

Energy storage performances of La doped SrBi5Ti4FeO18 films

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 431, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133999

Keywords

Energy storage; Layer engineering; PNRs; Breakdown strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12074204, 11864028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study designs a five-layer lead-free material for dielectric film capacitors, which shows improved relaxation behavior and breakdown strength through layer engineering, achieving superior energy storage performances.
Developing environment-friendly dielectric film capacitors with excellent energy storage performances is a valuable and challenging task for current electronic devices. This work designs a five-layered lead-free SrBi5-x- LaxTi4FeO18 (SBLTF-x) relaxor ferroelectric films with higher polarization and breakdown genes. Interestingly, high content of La3+ ions substitution for Bi3+ ions in SBLTF-x films enter not only pseudo-perovskite (SrBi3-Ti4FeO16)(2-)layers but also (Bi2O2)(2+) layers. The relaxation behavior and the electric breakdown strength are improved by layer engineering including the inter-layer distortion and interaction between pseudo-perovskite and (Bi2O2)(2+) layers, thus achieving superior energy storage performances. Ultrahigh recoverable energy storage density of 142.8 J/cm(3) and a high efficiency of 80% were obtained simultaneously under 3085 kV/cm in SBLTF-1.00 film. Moreover, the film also behaves excellent stability of temperature (-20-120celcius), frequency (0.05 k-20 kHz) and cycling (10(8) cycles). This work not only develops a promising environmentally benign candidate for dielectric energy storage capacitors, but also provides an effective strategy to regulate energy storage performances by layer engineering in Aurivillius-type bismuth layer-structured ferroelectric films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available