4.4 Review

Machine learning approaches and their applications in drug discovery and design

Journal

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 136-153

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.14057

Keywords

artificial intelligence; chemoinformatics; computational; machine learning; pharmacological

Funding

  1. UGC-BSR [F.30-501/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review focuses on several machine learning approaches used in chemoinformatics, which have shown great potential in improving drug discovery. These approaches can effectively model various physicochemical properties of drugs and have achieved good accuracy in recent years.
This review is focused on several machine learning approaches used in chemoinformatics. Machine learning approaches provide tools and algorithms to improve drug discovery. Many physicochemical properties of drugs like toxicity, absorption, drug-drug interaction, carcinogenesis, and distribution have been effectively modeled by QSAR techniques. Machine learning is a subset of artificial intelligence, and this technique has shown tremendous potential in the field of drug discovery. Techniques discussed in this review are capable of modeling non-linear datasets, as well as big data of increasing depth and complexity. Various machine learning-based approaches are being used for drug target prediction, modeling the structure of drug target, binding site prediction, ligand-based similarity searching, de novo designing of ligands with desired properties, developing scoring functions for molecular docking, building QSAR model for biological activity prediction, and prediction of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ligands. In recent years, these predictive tools and models have achieved good accuracy. By the use of more related input data, relevant parameters, and appropriate algorithms, the accuracy of these predictions can be further improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available