4.7 Article

Experimental and first-principles simulation study on oxidation behavior at 1700 °C of Lu2O3-SiC-HfB2 ternary coating for SiC coated carbon/carbon composites

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 8088-8096

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.010

Keywords

SiO2; Oxidation resistance; First-principles simulation; Thermal stability; C/C composites

Funding

  1. innovation talent promotion plan of Shaanxi province for science and technology innovation team [2020TD-003]
  2. China National Natural Science Foundation [51872239, 52061135102]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660265]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oxidation behavior and microstructure evolution of Lu2O3-SiC-HfB2 ceramic coating at 1700 degrees C were investigated. The ternary coating showed good antioxidant property and improved thermal stability, prolonging the oxidation protection time.
The oxidation behavior and microstructure evolution of Lu2O3-SiC-HfB2 ceramic coating specimen at 1700 degrees C were investigated systematically by experimental study and first-principles simulation. The prepared ternary coating possesses a compact morphology, which effectively defends C/C substrate against oxidation at 1700 degrees C for 130 h, showing a good antioxidant property. The formed HfSiO4, Lu2Si2O7, and HfO2 with high melting points play an active role in developing the thermal stability of the oxidized scale. Besides, Lu and Hf atoms incline to diffuse into SiO2, which enhances its structural stability. The improved thermal property of the oxidized scale for the Lu2O3-SiC-HfB2/SiC ceramic coating can delay the effective delivery of oxygen inwardly and thus prolong its oxidation protection time. The quick volatilization of SiO2 at 1700 degrees C induces that some glass phase evaporates with being not completely stabilized, which causes the formation of holes and the consumption of the inner coating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available