4.7 Article

Co-targeting WIP1 and PARP induces synthetic lethality in hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

CELL COMMUNICATION AND SIGNALING
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12964-022-00850-2

Keywords

WIP1; DNA damage repair; PAPR inhibitor; Hepatocellular carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972577]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province [LR19H160003, LQ22H160060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High expression of WIP1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with HCC. Inhibition of WIP1 and PARP induces synthetic lethality in HCC by augmenting DNA damage.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most fatal cancers. Due to limited strategies for effective treatments, patients with advanced HCC have a very poor prognosis. This study aims to identify new insights in HCC to develop novel strategies for HCC management. Methods: The role of WIP1 (wild type p53 induced protein phosphatasel) in HCC was analyzed in HCC cells, xenograft model, DEN (Diethylnitrosamine) induced mice liver cancer model with WIP1 knockout mice, and TCGA database. DNA damage was evaluated by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, western blotting, comet assay, and Immunofluorescence. Results: High expression of WIP1 is associated with the poor prognosis of patients with HCC. Genetically and chemically suppression of WIP1 drastically reduced HCC cell proliferation. Besides, WIP1 knockout retarded DEN induced mice hepato-carcinogenesis. Mechanically, WIP1 inhibition induced DNA damage by increasing H2AX phosphorylation (gamma H2AX).Therefore, suppression of WIP1 and PARP induced synthetic lethality in HCC in vitro and in vivo by augmenting DNA damage. Conclusion: WIP1 plays an oncogenic effect in HCC development, and targeting WIP1-dependent DNA damage repair alone or in combination with PARP inhibition might be a reasonable strategy for HCC management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available