4.7 Review

Tumor immunotherapies by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the pros and cons

Journal

CELL COMMUNICATION AND SIGNALING
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12964-022-00854-y

Keywords

Immune checkpoint inhibitors; CTLA-4; PD-1/PD-L1; Cancer; Immunotherapy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discovery of immune checkpoint proteins led to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a promising approach in tumor immunotherapy. However, resistance and treatment-related toxicities remain challenges in the clinical application of ICIs.
The main breakthrough in tumor immunotherapy was the discovery of immune checkpoint (IC) proteins, which act as a potent suppressor of the immune system by a myriad of mechanisms. After that, scientists focused on the immune checkpoint molecules mainly. Thereby, much effort was spent to progress novel strategies for suppressing these inhibitory axes, resulting in the evolution of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Then, ICIs have become a promising approach and shaped a paradigm shift in tumor immunotherapies. CTLA-4 plays an influential role in attenuation of the induction of naive and memory T cells by engagement with its responding ligands like B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86). Besides, PD-1 is predominantly implicated in adjusting T cell function in peripheral tissues through its interaction with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2. Given their suppressive effects on anti-tumor immunity, it has firmly been documented that ICIs based therapies can be practical and rational therapeutic approaches to treat cancer patients. Nonetheless, tumor inherent or acquired resistance to ICI and some treatment-related toxicities restrict their application in the clinic.The current review will deliver a comprehensive overview of the ICI application to treat human tumors alone or in combination with other modalities to support more desired outcomes and lower toxicities in cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available